Deputies In Zaryadye, Arbat - In Perm

Deputies In Zaryadye, Arbat - In Perm
Deputies In Zaryadye, Arbat - In Perm

Video: Deputies In Zaryadye, Arbat - In Perm

Video: Deputies In Zaryadye, Arbat - In Perm
Video: Пермь, Россия. Город на Каме! Урал Поездка 5. Live 2024, March
Anonim

After the publication in Vedomosti of a scandalous article telling about the intentions of the Administrative Department of the President of the Russian Federation to build a giant Parliamentary Center in Zaryadye, this initiative remained in the air - the authorities are in no hurry to confirm or deny it. Meanwhile, the idea itself has both ardent supporters and opponents among experts and ordinary citizens. The author of the hitrovka blog Nikolay Avvakumov, for example, considers it disastrous: “It's clear that with our passivity, the most unfortunate option will be embodied. Again traffic jams, gas contamination, etc. We need them all outside the Moscow Ring Road, and the historical center must belong to the people! " As an alternative project, the blog published a concept from the site of the development company "Manab". As Avvakumov writes, this is a project “with a partial recreation of the demolished architectural monuments of Zaryadye along the embankment. Houses of five floors, of course, will close all the churches of Varvarka from the embankment, but in comparison with Foster's inhuman "palaces of conventions" there is still something here."

In general, the idea of recreating the historical fabric on the site of the demolished Rossiya hotel with the arrangement of mini-hotels, restaurants and other public places is popular with many bloggers - they fear that the parliamentarians who have settled here will fence themselves off from the people and block the streets. By the way, today, according to the network author _petrusha, a significant part of the territory formally remains a public park: “No one has changed this status and here, it seems to me, it is worth fighting for these spaces …”. az_mnogogreshny agrees: “The ideal option is a park or a large lawn. There are good views of the Kremlin and Zaryadye churches from there. As an option - an artificial hill, inside which you can place a concert hall or a parking lot. " At the same time, bloggers did not hesitate to criticize the Manab project itself, for example, Boris Vinnikov writes: “The most unpleasant thing about this project is that they are closing the Cathedral of the Sign. From the south, a four-story building is shown very close to it, which will completely block the view of the cathedral from the south, from Zamoskvorechye. " But seakonst adheres to a slightly different position: “Taking this layout and the general concept, it is necessary to build up not in bulk, with typical five-story buildings, but to give it to different designers and different developers. The result will be the same inconsistency that is characteristic of the historical environment. And the deputies can't come here Everything will be blocked, as in Ipatievsky …"

While the fate of Zaryadye is being decided, in Perm the issue of creating a new public space has already been resolved - within the framework of the Cultural Capital project, this year part of Kirov Street (from Komsomolsky Prospekt to Gazeta Zvezda Street) will become a pedestrian street, like the Moscow Arbat. The news was shared by the deputy head of the local administration Lilia Shiryaeva on her blog on wordpress.com. She added that the author of the concept is Dmitry Lapshin from Perm, deputy chief architect of the city. Well, the promoter of the idea was the famous gallery owner and the main engine of Perm cultural innovations Marat Gelman, who was also one of the first to report the good news on his blog: “By June 1, Permsky Arbat will have platforms for artists, artisans, blacksmiths, potters and a stage for concerts, playgrounds, cafes, benches and lanterns will appear, corresponding to the spirit of the street."

Some bloggers loudly greeted the news - note that Perm residents have been fighting for their Arbat since the 1990s. For example, comments petrovich_z: “Of course, great, but somehow not serious. One block long pedestrian street. Can you "break through" to the Siberian? And there it would be logical to continue the walk along Sibirskaya up or down. " Another part of Perm residents, however, considered the choice of a street to create a pedestrian zone unsuccessful: their main complaint was the deterioration of the traffic situation. Writes derejor: “Nonsense, there are many squares where you can do this without harming traffic intersections, for example, st. Krasnova from Siberian to October 25 … ". amigo78 is even more cruel with the verdict: “There is a problem in ensuring the bandwidth in the latitudinal direction of our once glorious city … But no, we need to PR and break the transport connection. Along the way, abandoning and much more thought-out in terms of "pedestrian" site of st. Krupskaya, who has more reason to secure the name of "Perm Arbat". And the blog "Permsky Most" published a photo report on the current state of Kirov Street with "wonderful courtyards", disfigured car washes and tire changers.

Marat Gelman took an active part in changing the appearance of the center of Tver. The other day the festival "Believe in Tver" was opened there, the main site of which was "Tvertsa" - the former River Station, which had been in disrepair for many years. The opening of the festival was not without a scandal with representatives of the local diocese: jealousy is understandable, because the station, along with impious art objects, is not just anywhere, but on the territory of the former Otroch monastery, for which the church had its own plans. Nevertheless, we have to admit that if there were no festival, no one would have paid attention to the crumbling building in the coming years.

At the opening of "Believe in Tver", the station appeared "in its original form": it was freed from numerous partitions and billboards that appeared in the 1990s, the original interiors were restored, and a spire with a flagpole was installed on the roof. At this, the first stage of the reconstruction ended - during the repair, the accident rate of the building was eliminated. A detailed material from a local newspaper was posted on his blog by one of the ideologists of Rechnoy's transformation, Deputy Governor Alexei Kasprzhak. However, bloggers have many questions. For example, will the building be fully restored? Will the roof of the central part, as before, become a balcony, etc.? According to estimates, it is cheaper to demolish the station and rebuild it: restoration will cost several billion rubles, reconstruction - up to a billion rubles, but, as network authors, for example, regtver, rightly note, “knowing how they are building in our country now, there are more chances to stay with the old building ". “Let him stand until the time when honest officials will be in power. When will they build, not cut …”, - the blogger thinks. It is possible to evaluate the results of the work carried out on the basis of these photo panoramas - before and after the repair.

Returning again to Perm, where quite recently the head of the master plan, Andrey Golovin, was indicted, in the blogs of local architects we find a rather tough discussion of supporters and opponents of the strategy developed by the Dutch bureau KCAP. As you know, one of the apologists for the Dutch model of city development is the governor Oleg Chirkunov - not so long ago he even came up with a very correct article on this topic in Expert. He is fully supported by the architect and active blogger Alexander Rogozhnikov, but the concept of the master plan evokes evil irony among representatives of more conservative circles of local urban planners. So, in the blog of Alexander Vinogradov, an interesting essay appeared, in which the author calls the concept of the Dutch "pseudo-theory" and "zombie on the part of new town-planning revolutionaries." The author compares the Dutch installation for low-rise housing with the era of Khrushchev, when “for every house above this, permission from the State Construction Committee of the RSFSR was required. Now, instead of the Gosstroy of the RSFSR, local authorities have appeared. "One of the consequences, according to Alexander Vinogradov, will be that the Khrushchev buildings will remain forever: "Nobody will demolish you now to build new 4-storey houses instead of 5 floors." Another is that “in the current model of urban planning in Perm, as a“fifth wheel in a cart,”architecture and urban planning authorities are needed, all kinds of DPIRT and APU, which do not decide anything, do not have their own opinion, ordinary talking heads broadcasting decisions made in st. Kuibyshev ".

Such a passage could not fail to evoke a response from the supporters of Western urban planning theories. Here is what Alexander Rogozhnikov thinks about this: “In part, I finally see an explanation for that bacchanalia of crooked 25-storey towers that filled the city. They were not allowed to design, they were only allowed to bind. It is surprising that 9-16-25-storeyed concrete insulas seem to him a distinctive “Permian way”. Rogozhnikov himself finds an explanation for this in the fact that "for a person who has lived his whole life in a Russian provincial city, in a 9-16-25-storey building, it is difficult to truly feel all the stress of such an environment …". The author of enoden agrees: “Interestingly, Perm has been developing“naturally”for 20 years, in his (Alexander Vinogradov's - N. K.) opinion. 20 years is a fairly long period, based on the results of which one can draw a conclusion about the adequacy of such a development model. Those. does anyone really like the result? " The rest of the bloggers who left their comments have no illusions about this either. Here is what Larisa Gorshkova writes: “There is an unkempt 4-storey old center with ruined buildings and even architectural monuments. If we want to become a cultural capital, we need to preserve and restore what “foreigners” have and like, that is, provincial environmental architecture of the 20th century”.

The blogs of Moscow and St. Petersburg heritage defenders at that time were seething with indignation over two demolitions that happened according to tradition for the holidays: in Moscow, the Kolbe house was destroyed, and in St. Petersburg, the barracks of the Preobrazhensky regiment were lost. In both cases, the investors had permission to demolish, and in both cases, he ignored the requirements of the local authorities for the protection of monuments - KGIOP and the Moscow Heritage Committee. One after another, the facade walls of wonderful buildings collapsed. The residential "Parade Quarter" will now appear on the site of the barracks, but the developer of the territory, the Capital Group company, has not yet shown what will be erected on the ruins of the Kolbe house.

While excavators are crushing very strong walls of tenement houses and barracks, the Sukhanovo estate near Moscow is crumbling without outside help - from time and desolation. Recently, a volunteer clean-up took place there, during which a hundred volunteers, including students of architectural universities (the manor house is home to the rest house of the Union of Moscow Architects), cleared the main alleys, scraped off the inscriptions "Venus's gazebo", removed the descent from the main palace to the beach and the area around the ruined Houses of clergy. Architectural photographer Ilya Ivanov tells about the state of this amazing ensemble today.

We conclude today's review with an interesting publication in the magazine greedyspeedy entitled "The Virtual Palace of the Soviets." Based on the sketch and design documentation of the famous colossus, the author of the blog created a 3D version of the 1934 version, developed by Boris Iofan. And although the visualization turned out not without flaws and fantasies, it is quite impressive, as, incidentally, the washed-out Iofan himself quoted in the historical introduction. The publication sparked a lively discussion among bloggers about whether this project could, in principle, be implemented. It is curious that there were quite a few supporters of the monstrous building on the Internet: bloggers especially liked the idea of building the Iofanovsky palace on the site of the Moscow City International Business Center.

Recommended: