Do You Need Different Freaks?

Do You Need Different Freaks?
Do You Need Different Freaks?

Video: Do You Need Different Freaks?

Video: Do You Need Different Freaks?
Video: Drenchill ft. Indiiana - Freed from Desire (Official Video) 2024, March
Anonim

The reason for a multifaceted discussion between architects and critics was the article "A samovarch is boiling in the park", published in the Agency for Architectural News and dedicated to the results of an architectural competition for the best project of a samovar museum, which took place in the Tula region. The results of this competition, in which many interesting projects participated, and the building that looks like a giant samovar made of glass and porcelain stoneware won, angered the professional community. Architect Nikita Asadov comments bitterly on the blog of Project Russia on Facebook: “And no matter what architects try to come up with in their professional environment, whatever new identity they try to offer society, all attempts will remain unanswered. Until this society grows other desires and aspirations. Until disappointment comes in that monumental vulgarity, which has become a symbol of our real, not declared reality. " In the comments to this article, a dispute unfolded about how much freak architecture is needed in principle. Elena Gonzalez, for example, thinks: “Who said that architecture cannot be funny? I am personally not interested in seeing a "typical European museum" in all cities. Yaroslav Kovalchuk objects: “Funny architecture is a nightmare. Imagine that you are listening to the same anecdote every day, for many years … "The same Nikita Asadov sums up:" But when outright freakiness tries to combine itself with monumentality, when naive spontaneity begins to try to speak with a clever air on serious topics, we get nothing but "big bummer" - too serious for funny, too funny for serious. Well, you cannot revet a hut on chicken legs with porcelain stoneware, and in all seriousness say that in this way our country is taking the path of innovative development. " The result of the discussion was a proposal to hold an alternative vote for the submitted projects of the samovar museum by an alternative jury and publish its results.

In the same blog of the Project Russia magazine on Facebook, Anatoly Belov published his impressions of Alexander Kuzmin's press conference on the competition for the development of the territory of the former hotel “Russia”. “The jury of the competition has not been formed, the volume of presentation of the competition material has not been set (only the composition of the project exposition has been determined - the requirements for the scale of drawings and the format of submission have not been announced), the program of the competition has not been drawn up. Alexander Viktorovich, however, promised that in the very near future the program will be brought to mind - it will be posted on the websites of the Moscow Architecture Committee and the Union of Architects of Russia. The problem is that the clock is already ticking. The term is already short, and there is still a hitch with the program. " The commentators shared the author's bewilderment. In particular, Aleksey Muratov, editor-in-chief of Project Russia magazine, is convinced: “Our excellent Moscow Committee for Architecture and Architecture is absolutely incapable of holding any kind of competitions. Such an innocent detail - Mr. Kollontai, whom Mr. Kuzmin instructed to develop a task for a competition for the development of the Moscow metropolitan area (Greater Moscow), in order to ensure appropriate foreign participation in this "historical" event, simply drove the paper he had drawn up through a google translator. A small but eloquent detail."

Marina Khrustaleva, coordinator of the Arkhnadzor public movement and chairman of the board of the Moscow Society of Architectural Heritage Marina Khrustaleva, talks in detail about the development prospects of the Red October territory in the Do Not Break community dedicated to the demolition of historical buildings in Moscow and the study of world redevelopment experience. There is no fundamentally new information here, but Khrustaleva very clearly and clearly structures everything that is known about Krasny Oktyabr at the moment, paying attention to both the most valuable buildings on the territory of the former chocolate factory and the plans of Guta Development that took place before the crisis 2008, and the current state of affairs. The author of the post also answers the question of who and why could have provoked an information panic about Krasny Oktyabr.

As part of the 16th Golden Capital Festival, representatives of the Siberian Center for Contemporary Art and the Siberian Center for the Promotion of Architecture decided to erect a monument to the avant-garde artist El Lissitsky in the Novosibirsk Academgorodok. One of the initiators was the famous architectural critic Alexander Lozhkin. The ru_architect community quotes his arguments in favor of the appearance of such a monument: “Lissitsky has never physically been here (in Novosibirsk), but his German wife was exiled to Novosibirsk in 1941. Here, in the House of Scientists of the Academgorodok, his only exhibition in Russia took place. " True, it cannot be said that bloggers greeted this idea with enthusiasm. Some authors directly advise: "Let them build at their own expense and put them in their dacha." Others voiced more cautious concerns: “The idea is good, but the posters in the photograph upset us. Still, their design should be made worthy of the theme. Otherwise, the monument can become nominal if you do it with the same approach. " Boris Litvinov and Dmitry Popovsky also tell more about the festival itself.

Alexander Lozhkin himself, in his blog, dwelled on the fact that one of the main awards of the festival was received by Perm architects Viktor Tarasenko and Stanislav Shiryaev - their project of low-rise residential buildings in the Iva-3 residential complex in the Motovilikhinsky district was recognized as the best in the nomination “Urban planning complexes . Lozhkin, who now lives and works in Perm, proudly notes that this is the first victory of the Permians in the prestigious Russian architectural competition.

Another interesting publication of the ru_architect community was the post of the architectural photographer Ilya Ivanov, who shared pictures of the Shukhov Tower on the Oka - the world's only hyperboloid multi-section power transmission tower made in the form of a load-bearing mesh shell. The readers really liked the spectacular shots of this true masterpiece of engineering, although some people asked: "What is this thing for?"

And in Yaroslavl, an exhibition of sketches of a monument to the fallen hockey players of Lokomotiv has opened, according to the Svoboda Street blog. Both professional sculptors and novice artists participate in the competition for the best memorial - in total, both have completed more than 60 sculptural sketches. Very soon, one of the many options will be chosen - now in the foyer of the "Arena 2000" there is a popular vote, and the network is actively discussing projects.

The "Architectural Heritage" community has published publications about the history and main architectural sights of Pskov, as well as a large post dedicated to the Museum of Wooden Architecture, which has existed on the territory of the Kolomenskoye Museum-Reserve since 2006. Both publications are accompanied by spectacular winter photographs, and calling to see the described beauty with your own eyes.

Ilya Buyanovsky shares a story about a more distant journey with readers - in his blog he posted a whole series of publications devoted to the pre-revolutionary and Soviet architecture of Bratsk. The Sovarkh community, in turn, offers to take a walk through the oldest stations of the Leningrad metro. And the blog "News in Photos" published photos of the new school Vittra Telefonplan, located in Stockholm. In this educational institution there are no traditional classes, no boring monotonous desks - instead of them, students are offered a variety of lecture halls and laboratories, sports corners and public areas, decorated extremely democratic and brightly. According to the architects (bureau Rosan Bosch), such an environment is much more conducive to the formation of the personalities of the 21st century. True, not all Russian-speaking commentators of the project shared this enthusiasm - according to many bloggers, the too bright atmosphere of the school will only distract students and discourage them.

Recommended: