Blogs: November 9-15

Blogs: November 9-15
Blogs: November 9-15

Video: Blogs: November 9-15

Video: Blogs: November 9-15
Video: [November 9 - 15] Weekly Astro-Numerology Forecast 2024, March
Anonim

The long-term construction in front of the Moscow Architectural Institute at 8 Rozhdestvenka has finally come to an end. Recall that all this time a new building of the Bank of Moscow was being erected here, for the sake of which in the late 2000s the so-called. the house of Firsanov, marked by the stay of many famous people in the past and having a protective status. They demolished with a scandal: during the confrontation with the developers, the city defender Lyudmila Melikova died. The other day the new building bared its facades, and the architectural community was outraged: another pompous "remake" has grown neatly in front of the main architectural university, like an insulting mockery. A long discussion about this unfolded on Boris Uborevich-Borovsky's Facebook blog. Despite appeals to criticize constructively, the comments mainly boiled down to emotions and the search for the culprits, whom the bloggers began to calculate in the bowels of Mosproekt-2. “The street is chamber and requires a fundamentally different solution, of a different scale. The apotheosis of soullessness,”writes, for example, Vera Zueva. "Can you imagine what architects will come out of our almamater now that they now see this every day?" - Anatoly Belov comments. "The architect came out of the K. I. Blank building, lined with two stalls for sheep with a hut in the middle of the facade of the building of K. I. Blank," adds Anton Kochurkin, "but I entered Rozhdestvenka two days ago and could not answer the question, where am I?"

Mikhail Osipov came to the defense of the designers: the architect reminded especially ardent critics, “what is it like to design such a volume in such a close building, how difficult it is to coordinate and build, and then remake it in a short time, because the leadership has changed”. In turn, Vasily Gnuchev blamed the customer for the architectural failure: “Look again at the project. Does it have anything to do with the result? The facades are roughly changed, some eerie colors are used. If the customer can do this with impunity with the project, the question arises: why design at all? The majority, of course, agreed that there was no need to design and in general, because “a good-quality restoration would be better than anything else,” as Andrey Bezukladnikov notes.

In the meantime, the results of the competition in Zaryadye, announced on Tuesday, were greeted rather ambiguously. Yaroslav Kovalchuk on Facebook, for example, believes that the contest is “close to ideal”: “I like it. Especially the boulevard on the bridge. I kept thinking whether someone would guess to do it or not. And with climatic zones everything is cool, you can also add desert and subtropics. And in general, if the park is, then such, uncompromising, otherwise it is not worth starting. However, other ideas with artificial nature were recognized as controversial, if at all realizable. “Well, how to explain to the layman why change“Russia”for a swamp?”, Alexander Kuptsov notes in the comments. Alexander Antonov writes that a hotel is generally more needed in Zaryadye, because the park will serve tourists, and they “have nowhere to live either” in Moscow. And why on earth is a park, Daniil Lorenz adds, if there has been a city here for many centuries? “With these bells and whistles it will be the same as with the“golden grid”of the new Mariinsky, - concludes Igor Fedyukin. “They’ll waste some years, they’ll find out that it’s impossible to build it in our climate, and everything will end in the same horror as in St. Petersburg.”

zooming
zooming

"Swamps, tundra, steppe and forest" a stone's throw from the Kremlin do not inspire confidence in Mikhail Belov, as well as the plans of the capital's mayor's office, in whose statements the architect found many contradictions. “Most of all I was amused by the statement of the American laureates“natural urbanism is smart nature,”Belov writes, recalling that the park is being sold with taxpayers' money and within the framework of Federal Law No. 94, where“the concept stage is not envisaged at all, and tenders are held at each stage. on the cheapest contractor of working documentation, including "field supervision" ".

Another discussion, this time about journalistic ethics, has recently been centered on critic Grigory Revzin for his sensational article "Icebergs Are Designed on Titanic."Masha Gessen on Facebook recalled that “just 4 months ago, the author campaigned for Sobyanin, wrote that there is no water on the Sobyanin stove and that there is no homophobia,” and urged Revzin to repent that “he contributed his three kopecks to Sobyanin’s 50%, ashamed there, or practiced, or whatever … ". The article, meanwhile, turned out to be very popular on the network and many bloggers who repost did not at all attach any importance to such turns in the attitude of the critic to the capital's mayor's office. Igor Kulichik, for example, notices that the critic writes everything correctly, which is why it even "got scary … But from the window side, everything is really very decent and decorous: competitions, tenders, pedestrian zones and other" kapkovschina ". And Anna Narinskaya considers Revzin consistent: “He hoped for Sobyanin, saw that he was doing something good and entered the city council. There he tried to influence the agenda, but seeing how all this was happening there, he loudly announced that it was coming out. " There is, however, another opinion - the "Grands", probably, decided to use Revzin's hands to "dunk" young architects who were able to defeat them in a prestigious competition and snatch a solid order ", the user under the nickname Albert Bendersky considers the purpose of the article.

Well, the blogs of city rights defenders have been following the drama in Korolev near Moscow all the last days, where a constructivist monument, the House of the Stroybyuro of the Bolshevsk Labor Commune, built one of the first in 1928-1935, is being destroyed by very traditional means in such cases. News from the scene has been reported all week by the chairman of the Moscow regional branch of VOOPIIK Evgeny Sosedov in a blog on Facebook. According to the activist, as a result of a conspiracy between local authorities, firefighters, the police, the Ministry of Emergency Situations and the developer, they set the house on fire for the eighth time, and then “extinguished” it, breaking through the walls. The defenders of the house are also saddened by the fact that on the eve, under the layers of wallpaper, there were accidentally discovered frescoes by the avant-garde artist Vasily Maslov of the 1920s, which were previously considered lost. In response to the vote deployed on the Kultura Podmoskovya website on the demolition of the house, a similar group was created on Facebook, where arguments for and against the destruction of the building were gathered all week. Unfortunately, the actions of the activists, with the complete inaction of the Ministry of Culture, did not prevent the demolition. “The developer, without even bothering to imitate a fire, is crushing the eastern flank of the building. Still from the side of the yard. Apparently, the frescoes will die by the evening,”Yevgeny Sosedov reports in his November 12 entry. By the end of the week, only one facade wall remained from the house, however, the defenders of the house urge users to continue to vote “against”, because “the results will be actively used by all parties in the future, and if the number of“for demolition”is greater than“against”, then they will shut us up forever."

Recommended: