Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
On February 1, Alexander Lozhkin wrote about this in his blog.
The strategic master plan for Perm has been discussed for about a year now. He is cited as an example, exhibited, admired. A whole issue of the Project Russia magazine and a whole hall on Arch-Moscow in the Central House of Artists last summer were dedicated to him. This plan is like a breath of fresh air: clear, beautifully drawn, and clearly presented. He promises - when you read about him, you can clearly feel it - a cozy European life.
The master plan, adopted on January 17 by the Perm Duma, is presented with the master plan on one site. These are interrelated projects, they relate to each other, figuratively speaking, like nesting dolls: the general plan is "tactical" - for 6-12 years; the master plan is strategic, for a long time. The master plan implements the provisions of the master plan. The development of both plans was led by one person, Andrei Golovin. The master plan is part of the master plan, it is now legally binding and is set to implement many of the things outlined in the KCAP master plan. If you look at it at least diagonally, you will immediately feel - at the level of emotions - what it is: different. It has a preamble, where the main topics are set out in understandable words for non-specialists; nothing of the kind was in the Moscow master plan, which, on the contrary, is terribly difficult to read. Further, the Perm master plan has an extensive network of bike paths and public transport. There are many good things, visible even to the inexperienced eye.
However, not everyone shares the enthusiasm. There was an open letter from Perm ubranists, outraged by the interference of foreigners in their sphere of activity, there were even accusations of disclosing state secrets, now Andrei Golovin is being sued for "negligence." Reason: the Perm master plan is an optional document by law, which means that it should not have been ordered and paid for. So Perm, almost simultaneously, accepts the general plan and is going to judge one of those people who made it.
This, however, is all emotion. Alexander Lozhkin, who has been researching this problem for a long time, described the situation much more accurately and succinctly. We highly recommend reading his article for the GRADO magazine, the situation is very clearly described there. And I don’t want to retell the message about the trial, so let us quote it in full:
Alexander Lozhkin, blog:
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 “Strategic Master Plan of Perm - unnecessary work?
He returned from Perm.
Two news, which, in general, is not news, but did not receive wide coverage.
The first one is good: the City Duma adopted and after the publication on December 31, 2010 (!) In the Bulletin of local self-government (in full!), The City Master Plan came into effect, which, like the Strategic Master Plan (SMP), seems to me to be a completely innovative character for Russia.
First, the planning horizon has been seriously reduced. There are two steps in the Perm State Enterprise - 6 and 12 years. I think this is completely justified, the general plan, IMHO, is not a strategic, but tactical planning document. The strategic role remained with the NSR, in which the planning horizon is fundamentally not indicated. The horizon is the horizon, to always be unattainable))). Secondly, the General Plan is not a lie. It relies only on those resources and opportunities that really exist. And therefore the chance that it will be a really executable document and break that vicious Russian practice when the implementation of the general plan by 15% within the estimated time is considered the norm.
The second news is bad. On February 11, the trial of Andrei Golovin, director of the Perm municipal unitary enterprise "Bureau of Urban Projects", the head of the development of both the Strategic Master Plan and the General Plan of Perm, will begin. He is charged under Part 1 of Art.293 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation that … ordered KCAP and other companies involved in the work of the Strategic Master Plan of Perm and paid for this work, which, according to the investigation, "is not a scientific research, does not have the proper degree of validity, argumentation and elaboration for the possibility of its direct use in the development of the General plan of the city of Perm ". Despite the fact that the General Plan, based on the provisions of the NSR, has been adopted and entered into force!
The absurd accusation is based on the expert opinion of Sergei Dmitrievich Mityagin, the head of the general plan department of the Directorate for non-state examination of project documentation and the results of engineering surveys of the North-Western Regional Branch of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences (the country should know its heroes!). His conclusion could well pass for a polemical article, appropriate at a scientific conference or in a professional journal, however, comparing the materials of the SMP with those that are required from the "substantiation of the general plan" (and I must say that they are not spelled out in detail in the law), then with the requirements of the master plan itself (and the master plan is not a master plan!), he comes to the above-described conclusions, happily picked up by the investigation. Despite the fact that the NSR is much broader than any justification or concept of the general plan and is implemented not only through the GP, but also through a bunch of other documents, incl. planning projects, PZZ, targeted regional and city programs, etc.
I will also say that initially a criminal case was opened over a violation of the notorious 94-FZ law on public procurement (they say, they ordered a master plan without a competition), but they did not fuse, and after receiving this examination, the case was re-qualified for negligence. I also note that, in my opinion, the case is clearly ordered: the NSR prohibits construction outside of already built-up areas, which, of course, greatly upsets developers who have bought farmland and woodlands and made plans for the construction of housing estates on them. Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4"
